test: bridge call integration test #583
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes enhance cross-chain operations within the Changes
Sequence DiagramsBridge Call FlowsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CrosschainTestSuite
participant BridgeModule
participant AuthQuery
User ->> CrosschainTestSuite: Start BridgeCallTest()
CrosschainTestSuite ->> BridgeModule: Perform Bridge Call with Multiple Tokens
BridgeModule -->> CrosschainTestSuite: Return Nonce
CrosschainTestSuite ->> BridgeModule: Query Pending Bridge Call by Nonce
BridgeModule -->> CrosschainTestSuite: Return Pending Bridge Call Information
CrosschainTestSuite ->> BridgeModule: Confirm Bridge Call
BridgeModule -->> CrosschainTestSuite: Return Confirmation Status
CrosschainTestSuite ->> AuthQuery: Query Module Account By Name
AuthQuery -->> CrosschainTestSuite: Return Module Account Info
CrosschainTestSuite -->> User: BridgeCallTest() Completed
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- tests/crosschain_suite.go (3 hunks)
- tests/crosschain_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/integration_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/suite.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
tests/integration_test.go (1)
68-68: Addition ofBridgeCallTest()toTestRun()is appropriate.The placement of
BridgeCallTest()withinTestRun()seems well-integrated with the sequence of other tests, ensuring comprehensive coverage of bridge functionalities.tests/crosschain_test.go (1)
20-20: Review of new import statement.The import of
erc20typesis appropriate if it's used within the file for ERC20 token operations. Ensure that this import is utilized effectively in the code to avoid unnecessary dependencies.Verification successful
Import statement verified.
The
erc20typesimport is utilized withintests/crosschain_test.goto query the ERC20 module account, confirming its necessity and relevance.
- Usage found in:
erc20ModuleAddr := suite.QueryModuleAccountByName(erc20types.ModuleName)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of erc20types in crosschain_test.go # Expect: Usages of erc20types should be present in the file. rg --type go 'erc20types' tests/crosschain_test.goLength of output: 184
tests/suite.go (1)
560-569: Review ofQueryModuleAccountByNamemethod.The
QueryModuleAccountByNamemethod is a valuable addition for querying module accounts by name. It appears to be implemented correctly, handling errors and unpacking results properly. However, ensure that:
- Error Handling: All potential errors are considered, especially around GRPC calls and data unpacking.
- Performance: This method should be optimized to avoid unnecessary GRPC calls if the module name is not expected to change frequently.
Overall, the method is well-implemented but could benefit from caching mechanisms if performance becomes a concern.
tests/crosschain_suite.go (2)
551-553: Approved new methodBridgeCallwith suggestions for improvements.The method is implemented correctly. Consider adding more detailed logging to trace the values of
nonceand the response for easier debugging and verification.
610-641: Approved new methodBridgeCallConfirmwith suggestions for improvements.The method correctly implements the bridge call confirmation logic. Consider adding detailed error messages and logging to provide more context in case of failures during the confirmation process.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Tests