WIP: TF_WP

[ivanmaione]

Linked Issues

Closes #138

Description

Interface Changes

Checklist

I confirm that I have completed the following checks:

• Tests run locally and pass pytest tests --reactor
• Code quality checks run locally and pass pre-commit run --from-ref develop --to-ref HEAD
• Documentation built locally and checked sphinx-build -W documentation/source documentation/build

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
132 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
6.1% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[ivanmaione]

@CoronelBuendia I cannot rebase the previous branch in the "correct" way. The easy solution was to create a new branch starting from develop. If it is ok, I will close the other PR (just labelled as "obsolete" for the moment). Sorry for the confusion.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 874 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.29%. Comparing base (00e9f87) to head (194efbc).
Report is 44 commits behind head on develop.

Files	Patch %	Lines
bluemira/magnets/fatigue.py	0.00%	157 Missing ⚠️
bluemira/magnets/conductor.py	0.00%	155 Missing ⚠️
bluemira/magnets/cable.py	0.00%	150 Missing ⚠️
bluemira/magnets/case_tf.py	0.00%	137 Missing ⚠️
bluemira/magnets/materials.py	0.00%	103 Missing ⚠️
bluemira/magnets/strand.py	0.00%	90 Missing ⚠️
bluemira/magnets/winding_pack.py	0.00%	42 Missing ⚠️
bluemira/magnets/utils.py	0.00%	40 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3082      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    74.27%   72.29%   -1.98%     
===========================================
  Files          242      239       -3     
  Lines        26825    27745     +920     
===========================================
+ Hits         19923    20058     +135     
- Misses        6902     7687     +785     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
E Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
E Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
E Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint