Timestamp format does not preserve order for long (> 1 hour) videos

[pranavmarla]

Due to the way that timestamps are currently formatted in the screenshot names, the order of the screenshots is not preserved for videos greater than 1 hour.

For example, let's say I am watching a video called MyVideo, which is > 1 hour long. I take two screenshots:

• Screenshot A is taken at the 5 min 41 sec mark
• Screenshot B is taken at the 1 hour 3 min 16 sec mark

Ideally, the screenshots should be named in such a way that screenshot A is sorted before screenshot B. However, the opposite happens -- the later screenshot (B) is sorted before the earlier screenshot (A). This is because the screenshots are named like this:

• Screenshot A: MyVideo ... 5-41 screenshot.png
• Screenshot B: MyVideo ... 1-3-16 screenshot.png

Since 1 < 5, Windows incorrectly sorts screenshot B first.

Instead, if a video is > 1 hour long, there should be an extra 0- at the start of the timestamp (for screenshots taken before the 1 hour mark) to ensure the order is preserved.
In the above example, that means the new names would be:

• Screenshot A: MyVideo ... 0-5-41 screenshot.png
• Screenshot B: MyVideo ... 1-3-16 screenshot.png

Now, since 0 < 1, Windows would correctly sort screenshot A first.