Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add validation for unique IDs within a document #303

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 25, 2018

Conversation

mpsonntag
Copy link
Contributor

@mpsonntag mpsonntag commented Oct 18, 2018

To prepare for #258 this PR introduces validation checks for duplicate IDs within a document.

Update:
The github.io documentation now also features the latest version of the data model and a brief description of the commandline convenience scripts.

@achilleas-k
Copy link
Member

@jgrewe do you have time to have a look at this?

Copy link
Member

@jgrewe jgrewe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, tiny comment, though

self.obj = obj
self.msg = msg
self.type = type
self.type = rank
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if we use 'rank' in the user facing api, should we also rename type to rank?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed we should!

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 25, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.06%) to 77.651% when pulling 4674ecf on mpsonntag:idcheck into 7ee5066 on G-Node:master.

@achilleas-k
Copy link
Member

Good to merge (when the tests finish)?

@jgrewe jgrewe merged commit 040fe23 into G-Node:master Oct 25, 2018
@mpsonntag mpsonntag deleted the idcheck branch October 25, 2018 13:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants