Hotfix: Correct the order of the parameters for the FPCA in Mahalanobis

[m5signorini]

The constructor for FPCA receives parameters in a different order than the one used in Mahalanobis.

scikit-fda/skfda/preprocessing/dim_reduction/_fpca.py

Lines 87 to 94 in 05a35df

	def __init__(
	self,
	n_components: int = 3,
	centering: bool = True,
	regularization: Optional[L2Regularization[FData]] = None,
	components_basis: Optional[Basis] = None,
	_weights: Optional[Union[ArrayLike, WeightsCallable]] = None,
	) -> None:

Thus, the last two parameters should be interchanged in the call to the constructor in Mahalanobis.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 85.53% // Head: 85.53% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (af8aafb) compared to base (42d0cdb).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #506   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    85.53%   85.53%           
========================================
  Files          141      141           
  Lines        11280    11280           
========================================
  Hits          9648     9648           
  Misses        1632     1632           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
skfda/misc/metrics/_mahalanobis.py	83.72% <ø> (ø)
skfda/preprocessing/dim_reduction/_fpca.py	91.20% <ø> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.