gam csv and gam batch commands not working as expected

[loweaxerium]

The issue tracker is for reporting product deficiencies. "How do I?" questions should be posted to the discussion forum at https://groups.google.com/group/google-apps-manager. When in doubt, start at the discussion forum and return here only when instructed to do so.

Please confirm the following:

• I have upgraded to the latest GAM release from https://git.io/gamreleases and I still have this issue.
  This issue happens on versions 6.14 and 6.15, not on 6.13
• I am typing the command as described in the GAM Wiki at https://github.com/jay0lee/gam/wiki

Full steps to reproduce the issue:

1. gam csv courses.csv gam course ~Alias sync teachers group ~Group
   Or
2. gam batch batch.gam

Inside batch.gam
gam csv courses.csv gam course ~Alias sync teachers group ~Group
commit-batch
gam courses.csv gam update course ~Alias status ACTIVE

Expected outcome (what are you trying to do?):
Individual commands being run correctly

Actual outcome (what errors or bad behavior do you see instead?):
No command is run (Apparently this only happens with course commands)

[taers232c]

Due to the way Standard GAM is coded, neither of these commands can work because of thread/process handling.

With Advanced GAM, this command will work as is:
gam csv courses.csv gam course ~Alias sync teachers group ~Group
This command will work as modified:
gam tbatch batch.gam

https://github.com/taers232c/GAMADV-XTD3/wiki/How-to-Upgrade-from-Standard-GAM

Ross

[ferferga]

@taers232c This is a bit off-topic, but why not contribute these fixes here, upstream? I saw that you have some commits in this repo, it's not like it's abandoned or something... I don't see the reason for a fork?

[taers232c]

The fork happened ten or so years ago. ---- Ross Scroggs ***@***.***

…

On Oct 9, 2023, at 9:13 AM, Fernando Fernández ***@***.***> wrote: @taers232c <https://github.com/taers232c> This is a bit off-topic, but why not contribute these fixes here, upstream? I saw that you have some commits in this repo, it's not like it's abandoned or something... I don't see the reason for a fork? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1478 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCTYL6NIS76TDLHCO4WFDTX6QPBNAVCNFSM5NXZRORKU5DIOJSWCZC7NNSXTN2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQ5TCNZVGMZDSNZVHAZQ>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.