-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hotfix/no_tiles_in process #316
Conversation
weiyuan-jiang
commented
Sep 24, 2020
- fix the situation when there is no tiles in a process
- Determine NUM_LDAS_ENSEMBLE entry in lenkf.j from LDAS.rc, replacing the independent, ldas_setup-generated specification in lenkf.j
- use the relative link path. When the whole directory is moved (like CURRENT to BASELINE) the link would be still valid.
2) Determine NUM_LDAS_ENSEMBLE entry in lenkf.j from LDAS.rc, replacing the independent, ldas_setup-generated specification in lenkf.j
@weiyuan-jiang : I (re-)fixed the use of the optional argument "obsbias_ok_tmp" and added a few comments, see commit |
good catch. I have test this branch and it seems zero-diff |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved. I understand the comment by @weiyuan-jiang to mean that the branch is 0-diff vs develop in the current test suite. What remains to be seen is if the branch is 0-diff between the (old) 1d decomposition (w/ optimization) and the new 2d decomposition functionality.
In any case, I'm ok with merging the branch at this time because it is 0-diff in the current test suite and because it fixes other things.
But we may need additional modifications to achieve 0-diff between the 1d and 2d decompositions.
cc: @biljanaorescanin