Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Point to GEOSgcm_GridComp branch with non-0-diff snow model fixes #730

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

gmao-rreichle
Copy link
Contributor

This non-0-diff PR makes the GEOSldas develop branch use the GEOSgcm_GridComp branch bugfix/rreichle/snow_excs, which implements the non-0-diff snow model fixes of GEOS-ESM/GEOSgcm_GridComp#813.

These fixes should be used in GEOSldas going forward, and the plan for GEOSldas release v18.0.0-beta is to point to a GEOSgcm_GridComp tag (SMAP_NRv11.1) that includes the fixes.

Merging this PR will require re-baselining all GEOSldas nightly tests.

Merging this PR will also require keeping the GEOSgcm_GridComp branch bugfix/rreichle/snow_excs of GEOS-ESM/GEOSgcm_GridComp#813 synchronized with the GEOSgcm_GridComp develop branch.

Once the non-0-diff snow model fixes have been merged into the GEOSgcm_GridComp develop branch, the GEOSldas develop branch must be reverted back to pointing to the GEOSgcm_GridComp develop branch, and GEOSldas release v18.0.0-beta must be created that is 0-diff w.r.t. v18.0.0-beta. Note that v18.0.0 should also include the restructuring of the GEOSldas repo (tentatively #717).

@mathomp4 @biljanaorescanin @weiyuan-jiang

@gmao-rreichle gmao-rreichle marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2024 20:16
@gmao-rreichle gmao-rreichle requested a review from a team as a code owner March 13, 2024 20:16
@gmao-rreichle gmao-rreichle merged commit 86d6aef into develop Mar 13, 2024
7 checks passed
@gmao-rreichle gmao-rreichle deleted the feature/rreichle/non-0-diff-snow-model-fixes branch March 13, 2024 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants