Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GITS-CEN, Shortwave radiation: values multiplied by ~2 in GC-Net data #7

Closed
BaptisteVandecrux opened this issue Sep 29, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
refinements possible An adjustment was applied but its parameters were poorly constrained. Could be refined.

Comments

@BaptisteVandecrux
Copy link
Member

CEN_SWrad - Kopi

@BaptisteVandecrux BaptisteVandecrux changed the title Dye-2, Shortwave radiation: values multiplied by ~2 in GC-Net data CEN, Shortwave radiation: values multiplied by ~2 in GC-Net data Sep 29, 2020
@BaptisteVandecrux BaptisteVandecrux changed the title CEN, Shortwave radiation: values multiplied by ~2 in GC-Net data GITS-CEN, Shortwave radiation: values multiplied by ~2 in GC-Net data Oct 1, 2020
@BaptisteVandecrux BaptisteVandecrux transferred this issue from GEUS-Glaciology-and-Climate/GC-Net-evaluation Dec 8, 2020
@BaptisteVandecrux
Copy link
Member Author

BaptisteVandecrux commented May 16, 2022

The linear regression between the ISWR at CEN and GITS indicates that there is a multiplicative correction of 0.385 applied to the GITS data would minimize least squared error. It is used for adjustment of both ISWR and OSWR for all years after 2012

image

image

@BaptisteVandecrux BaptisteVandecrux added the refinements possible An adjustment was applied but its parameters were poorly constrained. Could be refined. label May 16, 2022
@BaptisteVandecrux
Copy link
Member Author

Least squared regression for hours with more than 100 W/m2 indicate a slope of 0.385 between the ISWR at GITS and CEN. We apply this multiplicative correction coefficient to all year at GITS after 2012.

image
image

@BaptisteVandecrux
Copy link
Member Author

I now identified that this issue comes from calibration factors improperly set in the way CR1000 logger files are being read. This is now solved through the calibration factors and not through this 0.385 multiplicative adjustment.

BaptisteVandecrux added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 14, 2022
- Updated GITS calibration factors and removed ISWR and OSWR adjustment found in #7
- New calibration factor for OSWR applied as a multiplicative adjustment (see #89)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refinements possible An adjustment was applied but its parameters were poorly constrained. Could be refined.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant