Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: automatic graph download #1574

Draft
wants to merge 58 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

feat: automatic graph download #1574

wants to merge 58 commits into from

Conversation

MichaelsJP
Copy link
Member

Pull Request Checklist

  • 1. I have rebased the latest version of the master branch into my feature branch and all conflicts
    have been resolved.
  • 2. I have added information about the change/addition to functionality to the CHANGELOG.md file under the
    [Unreleased] heading.
  • 3. I have documented my code using JDocs tags.
  • 4. I have removed unnecessary commented out code, imports and System.out.println statements.
  • 5. I have written JUnit tests for any new methods/classes and ensured that they pass.
  • 6. I have created API tests for any new functionality exposed to the API.
  • 7. If changes/additions are made to the ors-config.json file, I have added these to the ors config documentation
    along with a short description of what it is for, and documented this in the Pull Request (below).
  • 8. I have built graphs with my code of the Heidelberg.osm.gz file and run the api-tests with all test passing
  • 9. I have referenced the Issue Number in the Pull Request (if the changes were from an issue).
  • 10. For new features or changes involving building of graphs, I have tested on a larger dataset
    (at least Germany), and the graphs build without problems (i.e. no out-of-memory errors).
  • 11. For new features or changes involving the graphbuilding process (i.e. changing encoders, updating the
    importer etc.), I have generated longer distance routes for the affected profiles with different options
    (avoid features, max weight etc.) and compared these with the routes of the same parameters and start/end
    points generated from the current live ORS.
    If there are differences then the reasoning for these MUST be documented in the pull request.
  • 12. I have written in the Pull Request information about the changes made including their intended usage
    and why the change was needed.
  • 13. For changes touching the API documentation, I have tested that the API playground renders correctly.

Fixes # .

Information about the changes

  • Key functionality added:
  • Reason for change:

Examples and reasons for differences between live ORS routes, and those generated from this pull request

Required changes to ors config (if applicable)

@takb takb added this to To do in ors general Oct 19, 2023
@MichaelsJP MichaelsJP changed the title Profile hash feat: WIP Oct 19, 2023
jhaeu and others added 27 commits October 19, 2023 17:18
blobCreated was not present in yaml, but was served by the api endpoint
tried experimentally, commented out
graph ghz files might be downloaded but not yet extracted. Another download is only necessary, if there is a newer file in the repository
@jhaeu jhaeu changed the title feat: WIP feat: profile-hash based automatic graph download Feb 13, 2024
# Conflicts:
#	.github/workflows/run_maven_tests.yml
#	docs/technical-details/Graph-Management.md
#	ors-api/ors-config.yml
#	ors-api/src/main/java/org/heigit/ors/api/Application.java
#	ors-api/src/main/java/org/heigit/ors/api/EngineProperties.java
#	ors-api/src/main/java/org/heigit/ors/api/servlet/listeners/ORSInitContextListener.java
#	ors-api/src/main/resources/application.yml
#	ors-engine/pom.xml
#	ors-engine/src/main/java/org/heigit/ors/config/EngineConfig.java
#	ors-engine/src/main/java/org/heigit/ors/routing/RoutingProfile.java
#	ors-engine/src/main/java/org/heigit/ors/routing/RoutingProfileManager.java
#	ors-engine/src/main/java/org/heigit/ors/routing/configuration/RouteProfileConfiguration.java
#	pom.xml
Changes on main, that were merged into the branch, broke the implementation of the detection if local graph building or a graph repo should be used. This approach was controversial anyway. We replaced it with explicit properties for graph management. This has the side effect, that a graph is built locally, if it is not found in the repository and an existing source_file is configured. Whether this behavior is desirable is questionable, because the configured pbf could be of a different extent than configured.
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 14, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot
B Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

@jhaeu jhaeu changed the title feat: profile-hash based automatic graph download feat: automatic graph download Jun 21, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added feature and removed feature labels Jun 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
ors general
  
To do
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants