-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 435
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposed fix for the fully_correlated_conditional_repeat issue #1652
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1652 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 96.17% 96.35% +0.18%
===========================================
Files 86 86
Lines 3867 3868 +1
===========================================
+ Hits 3719 3727 +8
+ Misses 148 141 -7
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@pytest.fixture(name="full_cov", params=[True, False]) | ||
def _full_cov_fixture(request): | ||
return request.param | ||
|
||
|
||
@pytest.fixture(name="full_output_cov", params=[True, False]) | ||
def _full_output_cov_fixture(request): | ||
return request.param |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In another PR I saw this moved into a conftest.py - do you want to do that here already ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
Co-authored-by: st-- <st--@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: st-- <st--@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: st-- <st--@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Beautiful tests.
Proposal to fix #1651.
I have expanded the unit test cases for the
fully_correlated_conditional_repeat
andfully_correlated_conditional
to cover the problematic parameter combinations.