-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mct/bing v7 #144
Mct/bing v7 #144
Conversation
1df9acd
to
0a13be7
Compare
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
class AzureFormattedQuery < FormattedQuery | |||
class BingFormattedQuery < FormattedQuery | |||
DEFAULT_DOMAIN_SCOPE = 'site:gov OR site:mil'.freeze |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this replacing AzureFormattedQuery? I still see it in coverage/index.html line 43909.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds like that's from a previous test run. If you nuke your coverage
directory and re-run the specs, you should not see those old lines in coverage/index.html
. (Searching with git grep
should also ignore the coverage
directory, as it's listed in .gitignore
.)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
class BingV6ImageResponseParser < BingV6ResponseParser | |||
class BingImageResponseParser < BingResponseParser | |||
def results |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BingV6ImageResponseParser is also being referenced in : coverage/index.html line 43958 and 44265
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
class BingV5ResponseParser | |||
class BingResponseParser | |||
attr_reader :engine |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is also being referenced in index.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
291656c
to
ebe6d04
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
ebe6d04
to
1024fa5
Compare
f9bc295
to
eebb6ce
Compare
eebb6ce
to
b628620
Compare
b628620
to
a202239
Compare
No description provided.