Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add Eq to the "helper wrappers" (<?>), (<!>), (<#>) #109

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2023
Merged

Add Eq to the "helper wrappers" (<?>), (<!>), (<#>) #109

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2023

Conversation

googleson78
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Gabriella439 Gabriella439 merged commit 97a1826 into Gabriella439:main Aug 5, 2023
1 check passed
@Gabriella439
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for contributing that!

@googleson78
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now I'm wondering post-factum whether we should just add all the easy to derive instances for them, or at least Ord so someone could potentially put those in a Map, but that sounds like it's getting extremely niche.

@googleson78
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the awesome library btw! ❤️

@Gabriella439
Copy link
Owner

You're welcome!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@googleson78 @Gabriella439