Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Rspec Unit Tests #8

Merged
merged 37 commits into from
Oct 28, 2023
Merged

Add Rspec Unit Tests #8

merged 37 commits into from
Oct 28, 2023

Conversation

GeekyHacks
Copy link
Owner

@GeekyHacks GeekyHacks commented Oct 27, 2023

In this PR we did the following:

  • Installed the Rspec testing gem
  • Added all inquired test cases Book Person, Student, Teacher, Classroom, and Rental
  • Put them all on spec folder
  • Made sure that all test cases passed
  • Fix linter errors

@GeekyHacks GeekyHacks changed the title Add unit tests Add Rspec Unit Tests Oct 27, 2023
Copy link

@VICTOR-CHUKWU VICTOR-CHUKWU left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @GeekyHacks 👋

Good job so far!
There are some issues that you still need to work on to go to the next project but you are almost there!

almost

Highlights

  • Good PR
  • Classes tested correectly

Required Changes ♻️

Check the comments under the review.

Optional suggestions

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix is not crucial enough to stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you to take them into account as they can make your code better.

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Please, remember to tag me in your question so I can receive the notification.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, either valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

Comment on lines 1 to 7
require './person'

describe Person.new 23, 'Abdu' do
it { is_expected.to have_attributes(age: 23) }
it { is_expected.to have_attributes(name: 'Abdu') }
it { is_expected.to have_attributes(parent_permission: true) }
end

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Good work writing your unit tests, but you forgot to test methods in the class, methods like can_use_services, correct_name, add_rental also test default value for the optional name parameter if it is not provided

Copy link

@OLIPLICHE OLIPLICHE left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Team,

Great work on making the changes requested by a previous reviewer 👏
You've done well implementing some of the requested changes, but there are still some which aren't addressed yet.

Highlights

  • add unit tests 👍
  • Classes tested correctly 👍

Required Changes ♻️

Check the comments under the review.

Optional suggestions

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix won't stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you to take them into account as they can make your code better. Some of them were simply missed by the previous reviewer and addressing them will really improve your application.

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Please, remember to tag me in your question so I can receive the notification.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, either valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.


expect(book.rentals).to include(@rental)
end
end

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Hi, as stated by the previous reviewer, you forgot to test the method like testing the default value for the optional name parameter if it is not provided. Can you add this test to complete the test requirement?

Copy link

@fobadara fobadara left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi team,

Your project is complete! There is nothing else to say other than... it's time to merge it :shipit:
Congratulations! 🎉

APPRVED

Highlights

✅ Descriptive README
✅ Descriptive PR summary
✅ Clean code

Optional suggestions

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix won't stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you take them into account as they can make your code better. Some of them were simply missed by the previous reviewer and addressing them will really improve your application.

Cheers, and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Please, remember to tag me in your question so I can receive the notification.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think the code review was unfair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

@GeekyHacks GeekyHacks merged commit d6bee86 into dev Oct 28, 2023
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants