-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Duplicated power output constraints for VRE when Reserves are turned on #574
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
cfe316
added a commit
to cfe316/GenX
that referenced
this issue
Nov 11, 2023
This fixes GenXProject#573, where Reserves + Num_VRE_Bins > 1 would lead to the VRE_NO_POWER_OUT resources being able to contribute an infinite amount to the reserves. This fixes GenXProject#574, where VRE power output constraints were being applied length(VRE) times to all VRE resources, when Reserves = 1.
cfe316
added a commit
to cfe316/GenX
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2023
This fixes GenXProject#573, where Reserves + Num_VRE_Bins > 1 would lead to the VRE_NO_POWER_OUT resources being able to contribute an infinite amount to the reserves. This fixes GenXProject#574, where VRE power output constraints were being applied length(VRE) times to all VRE resources, when Reserves = 1.
This would be fixed by #562 . |
cfe316
added a commit
to cfe316/GenX
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2023
This fixes GenXProject#573, where Reserves + Num_VRE_Bins > 1 would lead to the VRE_NO_POWER_OUT resources being able to contribute an infinite amount to the reserves. This fixes GenXProject#574, where VRE power output constraints were being applied length(VRE) times to all VRE resources, when Reserves = 1.
cfe316
added a commit
to cfe316/GenX
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2023
This fixes GenXProject#573, where Reserves + Num_VRE_Bins > 1 would lead to the VRE_NO_POWER_OUT resources being able to contribute an infinite amount to the reserves. This fixes GenXProject#574, where VRE power output constraints were being applied length(VRE) times to all VRE resources, when Reserves = 1.
cfe316
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2023
This fixes #573, where Reserves + Num_VRE_Bins > 1 would lead to the VRE_NO_POWER_OUT resources being able to contribute an infinite amount to the reserves. This fixes #574, where VRE power output constraints were being applied length(VRE) times to all VRE resources, when Reserves = 1. This fixed #566, where some constraints in storage_symmetric were redundant. --------- Co-authored-by: Luca Bonaldo <39280783+lbonaldo@users.noreply.github.com>
The fix for this has been merged to develop. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Below, the
for
loop should be inside the if statement, not outside.Although this should not affect the results, these duplicated (by the number of VRE in the model) constraints would slow model creation and use extra memory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: