Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow retrofit of non-thermal resources #635

Closed
gschivley opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Allow retrofit of non-thermal resources #635

gschivley opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@gschivley
Copy link
Contributor

In the new retrofit feature of #600, do not limit retrofits to thermal resources. This would be useful for other technologies, such as repowering wind or upgrading the generation capacity at hydroelectric dams.

@filippopecci filippopecci added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 15, 2024
@cfe316
Copy link
Collaborator

cfe316 commented Feb 29, 2024

How would repowering wind be different from allowing capacity additions? Should I imagine it like

  • Taller wind farms --> access to better variability-curves, for example?
  • Adding capacity for the new curves necessitates removing capacity of the old shorter turbines.

@gschivley
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, something like that. We don't allow new-build where wind farms already exist, which are generally going to be good locations. So it's possible that as existing wind starts to retire we can use higher hub heights to get more consistent generation profiles.

I'm not sure if higher hub heights also allow for increased capacity. If capacity stays the same then interconnection infrastructure can be reused, reducing total costs. Something to look into.

@gschivley
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lbonaldo and @sambuddhac can this issue be closed with the 0.4 release?

@lbonaldo
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, the latest retrofit module introduced in version 0.4 enables the retrofit of non-thermal generators. So this issue can be closed. There is only a note when using retrofitting with multistage and setting myopic = 0 that is described in the documentation at the end of this section.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants