-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow retrofit of non-thermal resources #635
Comments
How would repowering wind be different from allowing capacity additions? Should I imagine it like
|
Yes, something like that. We don't allow new-build where wind farms already exist, which are generally going to be good locations. So it's possible that as existing wind starts to retire we can use higher hub heights to get more consistent generation profiles. I'm not sure if higher hub heights also allow for increased capacity. If capacity stays the same then interconnection infrastructure can be reused, reducing total costs. Something to look into. |
@lbonaldo and @sambuddhac can this issue be closed with the 0.4 release? |
Yes, the latest retrofit module introduced in version 0.4 enables the retrofit of non-thermal generators. So this issue can be closed. There is only a note when using retrofitting with multistage and setting |
In the new retrofit feature of #600, do not limit retrofits to thermal resources. This would be useful for other technologies, such as repowering wind or upgrading the generation capacity at hydroelectric dams.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: