Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EB Moran and Local Moran - enable saving standardized rates #1828

Closed
lanselin opened this issue Mar 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

EB Moran and Local Moran - enable saving standardized rates #1828

lanselin opened this issue Mar 4, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@lanselin
Copy link
Collaborator

lanselin commented Mar 4, 2019

The Save Results option in the EB Local Moran cluster/significance maps does not include an item to save the standardized rates. The same is the case with the save results option for the EB Moran scatter plot. Unlike the rate maps, it is thus not possible to recuperate the EB rates, unless they are computed separately in the calculator.

It would be more consistent to include an option to save the EB rates, e.g., similar to the way the differences can be saved for the differential local moran. This would affect the save results option in both the EB moran scatter plot and the EB local moran maps.

@lixun910 lixun910 self-assigned this Mar 4, 2019
lixun910 added a commit to lixun910/geoda that referenced this issue Mar 6, 2019
Add option to save the standardized rates in both EB moran scatter plot and the EB local moran map

add Negative category in multivariate Local Geary cluster map
@lixun910
Copy link
Member

lixun910 commented Mar 6, 2019

V205: the new options in Save Results dialog

screen shot 2019-03-06 at 1 43 15 pm

screen shot 2019-03-06 at 1 43 30 pm

@Ashitacarl
Copy link

GeoDa 1.12.1.211 (macOS Mojave, 10.14.3). Mar. 18 build.

Fix verified. Both Moran's I with EB rates and Local Moran's I with EB rates now have an option to save EB Rates.

1828-1

1828-2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants