gisdata deb package should not be required to install python-geonode in Ubuntu

[kalxas]

See http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1179

I am +1 to have gisdata in OSGeoLive (http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1180) but it should be flexible to remove if needed.

Thoughts?

[jj0hns0n]

@ingenieroariel is there a way to remove this just for the osgeolive distro?

[kalxas]

As Hamish proposed the package should be recommended. This would bring it in for everyone else

[ingenieroariel]

Yeah,

I do not know exactly what needs to be changed but I agree with the change.

There are many more packages in that position.

-a

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Angelos Tzotsos
notifications@github.comwrote:

As Hamish proposed the package should be recommended. This would bring it
in for everyone else

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1015#issuecomment-21815579
.

[kalxas]

This can be done for rc1 right?

[ingenieroariel]

Yes, I will take care of it

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Angelos Tzotsos
notifications@github.comwrote:

This can be done for rc1 right?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1015#issuecomment-21817582
.

[kalxas]

@ingenieroariel I can have a look at the debian files and report back

[kalxas]

Now that I think about it, perhaps the package should be split to gisdata and gisdata-metadata.

[jj0hns0n]

@ingenieroariel can we close this one?

[ingenieroariel]

I would be happy with the data + metadata split.

This cannot be closed yet, we would need another python-geonode release
that has not happened yet.

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Jeffrey Johnson
notifications@github.comwrote:

@ingenieroariel https://github.com/ingenieroariel can we close this one?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1015#issuecomment-22474731
.

[simod]

can be closed now, right?

[ingenieroariel]

yes