Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reflect owslib changes #312

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2012
Merged

reflect owslib changes #312

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2012

Conversation

menegon
Copy link
Member

@menegon menegon commented Jul 2, 2012

A year ago OWSLib has changed the keyword handling [1] so recent GeoNode installations always return "No keywords are listed for this layer." (search_result_detail).

This patch fixes the issue maintaining backward compatibility.

[1] geopython/OWSLib@73f6fe7#owslib/iso.py

@jj0hns0n
Copy link
Member

@tomkralidis does this look right?

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Member

yes, in OWSLib, ISO keywords are now md.identification.keywords[]['keywords'][] to take into account sets of keywords. Thesaurus and keywords type (per keyword set) are also supported, as exemplified in the PR.

jj0hns0n pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2012
reflect owslib changes
@jj0hns0n jj0hns0n merged commit 58d0ba5 into GeoNode:master Jul 17, 2012
cspanring pushed a commit to MAPC/geonode that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2013
ischneider added a commit to planetfederal/geonode that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2013
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 29, 2019

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@d1c4cd5). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #312   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   56.87%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      204           
  Lines             ?    12052           
  Branches          ?     1751           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     6855           
  Misses            ?     4624           
  Partials          ?      573

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants