You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Inline tags are now sanitized and , . : ; are removed. The user requested that they be allowed with a special syntax -
From the email -
! and ? could be useful inside a tag, and an extra space like +true ? Would not disturb the sentence too much.
Parentheses are a little more complicated.
You could have
(bla bla bla +tag)
where you do not want it to be part of the tag,
but also
bla bla bla +(tag)
where it would be part of the tag.
Parentheses perhaps could also include % : and ~, apart from the standard <> [] {} (), like +%tag%
But this is making things complicated.
Perhaps: do not allow {} and use them to do
+{complicated tag with special*}
Please vote on this issue with a 👍 reaction. It's one of the primary mechanisms used to prioritize issues. Please also subscribe to the issue if you're interested, as that way I can discuss possible implementations and share mockups.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Inline tags are now sanitized and
, . : ;
are removed. The user requested that they be allowed with a special syntax -From the email -
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: