Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing .coveralls.yml to fix #173 #174

Closed

Conversation

chrisosaurus
Copy link

No description provided.

@chrisosaurus
Copy link
Author

Hmm this may not work as-is due to the docker container being the way, please see the issue for more up-to-date information as I look into this
#173

@chrisosaurus
Copy link
Author

Updated which should now run coveralls correctly outside of docker

It is currently undetermined if this will correctly produce coverage information.

@chrisosaurus
Copy link
Author

chrisosaurus commented Jul 8, 2018

I'm not sure if this is now correctly calculating coverage, it still seems to be at 0%
https://coveralls.io/builds/17881231

to be run twice, ctest and make do not.
@hhirsch
Copy link
Member

hhirsch commented Sep 22, 2018

@wow2006 I want to close this without merging. Any objections?

@hhirsch
Copy link
Member

hhirsch commented Sep 22, 2018

Hmm. I think we should cherry pick e9559b3 first.

If that works out we can figure out if and how we remove the coveralls file from the repo.

@hhirsch hhirsch closed this Mar 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants