Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

editing attribute has unacceptable value for "multivalued" by default #1060

Closed
willow9886 opened this issue Aug 2, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@willow9886
Copy link
Contributor

image

Trying to edit an attribute in oxTrust, password, but for some reason the default value for multivalued field is multivalued which is an unacceptable value for that field.

This seems to be the case for editing any attribute. They all have default value for multivalued to multivalued even though thats not an acceptable value..

So basically to edit any attribute, you also have to set an acceptable value for multivalued. Shouldn't the field be set to an acceptable value by default??

@willow9886 willow9886 added this to the 3.1.4 milestone Aug 2, 2018
@syntrydy syntrydy self-assigned this Aug 3, 2018
syntrydy added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 3, 2018
yurem added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2018
Fix multivalue field issue #1060
@natt-tester
Copy link

natt-tester commented Sep 6, 2018

@syntrydy, I think we still need improvement in this issue: I've checked two random Attributes and they are not set to their default values as @willow9886 suggested; the "Multivalued" string is just cleared from the first dropdown option:
multi2

multi1

@natt-tester natt-tester reopened this Sep 6, 2018
@syntrydy
Copy link
Collaborator

syntrydy commented Sep 6, 2018

@natt-tester that is the expected behavior.

From the UI point of view, you can add an attribute with multivalued set to null, however Gluu ship with multiples attributes with that field set to null. These are attributes added via scripts and installation time, so no mean to enforce the field value.

So it is okay as it is right now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants