Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core(stacks): actually support joomla and october cms #11788

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 10, 2020
Merged

Conversation

connorjclark
Copy link
Collaborator

we needed these PRs GoogleChrome/lighthouse-stack-packs#59 GoogleChrome/lighthouse-stack-packs#60

and we needed to connect joomla detection to stack pack ...

@connorjclark connorjclark requested a review from a team as a code owner December 8, 2020 20:59
@connorjclark connorjclark requested review from patrickhulce and removed request for a team December 8, 2020 20:59
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Dec 8, 2020
@@ -22,11 +22,7 @@ describe('stack-packs lib', () => {
const result = lighthouseStackPacksDep
.filter(p => !stackPacksLib.stackPacksToInclude.find(p2 => p2.packId === p.id))
.map(p => p.id);
expect(result).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
Array [
"joomla",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lolll

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ya it didnt work for its intended purpose lol

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well at least we know it works :)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we convert this to toEqual([]); with a comment that we shouldn't bother updating a stack pack until detectors are in place? :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@patrickhulce patrickhulce left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

change itself is fine, test improvements though :)

@@ -22,11 +22,7 @@ describe('stack-packs lib', () => {
const result = lighthouseStackPacksDep
.filter(p => !stackPacksLib.stackPacksToInclude.find(p2 => p2.packId === p.id))
.map(p => p.id);
expect(result).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
Array [
"joomla",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we convert this to toEqual([]); with a comment that we shouldn't bother updating a stack pack until detectors are in place? :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants