-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
core(full-page-screenshot): do not render zero size rects #11853
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8e29855
core(full-page-screenshot): do not collect zero size bounding rects
connorjclark 05d8c25
fixtest
connorjclark c7922d3
update
connorjclark 2027fb4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into bounding-rect-zero
connorjclark bbae5dd
ok
connorjclark 001dea4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into bounding-rect-zero
connorjclark 7bf6bab
no fallback
connorjclark File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
other places use this function and might expect a 0x0 rect returned, though...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
darn @ts-expect-error and stringification! I'll look closer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nope, this is only used in two places: page-function getNodeDetails, and the FPS gatherer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can the silliness be avoided through other means like ignoring
head
contents?I agree that doing this for all elements that happen to not have size might be a mistake. The location can often still provide value in hidden element cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, I guess I meant a function called
getBoundingClientRect
seems like the wrong place to determine if it's worth keeping the rect from the element or not.getBoundingClientRectIfItHasSize
, maybe :)Agreed it is a little weird that all the uses of NodeDetails keep their
boundingRect
, though. e.g.LinkElements
didn't have any before #11405. Maybe we need an easy way for callers ofgetNodeDetails
to indicate that they know that 0x0 bounding rects aren't important and can be discarded?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
points well taken! I've reversed the approach here.