Shave 4 bytes off gzip

[chicoxyzzy]

Before

./src/index.js → dist/esm...
gzipped size: 576
raw size: 1709
created dist/esm in 313ms

./src/index.js → dist/cjs...
gzipped size: 627
raw size: 1830
created dist/cjs in 376ms

./src/index.js → dist/umd...
gzipped size: 718
raw size: 1947
created dist/umd in 436ms

After

./src/index.js → dist/esm...
gzipped size: 572
raw size: 1702
created dist/esm in 351ms

./src/index.js → dist/cjs...
gzipped size: 622
raw size: 1823
created dist/cjs in 293ms

./src/index.js → dist/umd...
gzipped size: 714
raw size: 1940
created dist/umd in 324ms

[surma]

Ahahaha, the code golf is real. Cheers.

[RReverser]

Hmm, I just realised that one unfortunate downside of this is that you will now get a syntax error on platforms where bigints are not supported yet, whereas previously the function would simply return false.

Is that intentional / what we want?

[chicoxyzzy]

@RReverser you are right. I did not think about it. Now I think that this commit should be reverted. Good thing is that new version with this change is not published yet. Sorry for my silliness 🤦‍♂️😬

[RReverser]

No worries. I think that this could be a valid solution, but then we should be very explicit about users needing transpilation for older browsers.

Do you want to make a revert PR? (and possibly add a comment)