New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update examples/raw_cloudevent to use official image #229
Comments
How do I reproduce this? |
Update the Dockerfile like the other examples to use the official image, try and build. |
I just looked at it again, looks like the current example probably hasn't been working for a while:
Output:
|
Have you run `pub upgrade` in the directory first? It's working fine for
me...
…On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 7:49 PM Tony Pujals ***@***.***> wrote:
This is the commit that breaks the example: 79e4e4f
<79e4e4f>
(PR #219
<#219>
).
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#229 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAEFCRA47RAJBOOQ7L4DQTTOHITDANCNFSM45BOCRFA>
.
|
I have. And the image doesn't build either, so that shouldn't be my environment. Anyway, why don't you just update the sample (as I originally asked) and if it works for you, then that's great. I updated the other samples. |
So
But since the So this makes me realize that we're versioning an application, but we're not committing the lock file. I'll add the lock file with an update for the example. Otherwise, the fix is to run |
Reopening. Will close this with #230. |
Will need to take a look at builder framework internals for
'Iterable<Object?>', which does not match the return type, 'Iterable<Object>', of the overridden method, 'StructuredSerializer.serialize'
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: