Move typescript code to ts

[yuwenma]

• Move ./go (mainly contains typescript related code) to ./ts
• keep ./go/api (this dir includes Kptfile schema)
• Move ./script (mainly for typescript) to ./ts
• Delete tests/e2e
• Simplify github cicd
• complete cleanup #331

[yuwenma]

@mengqiy This is ready to review. I removed two required presubmit checks: the e2e tests as we discussed offline and the go-ci which checks ./go.

Some other tasks I plan to do in separate PRs

• completed remove ./ts/go. I saw you have some previous work about the go cleanup. cleanup #331 +100 to remove out of date code.
• disable the node-ci since we do not have plan to modify typescript in short term. We can add it back easily if removing the ci in a separate PR.
• Maybe add a new ci for ./api when we plan to update the kptfile.

[mengqiy]

Move ./go/api to ./api (this dir includes Kptfile schema)

IIUC the plan is to use this repo to host TS and golang SDK. The stuff under go/api is not defined in a IDL, it is the golang language binding for Kptfile. What if we have the TS language binding for Kptfile in the future? Where should it live?
So IMO go/api is a reasonable location.

[mengqiy]

We should revive #331. I don't have bandwidth for it. Can you please pick it up?

[mengqiy]

disable the node-ci

I don't see it. Did I miss anything?

[yuwenma]

We should revive #331. I don't have bandwidth for it. Can you please pick it up?

For sure.

[yuwenma]

disable the node-ci

I don't see it. Did I miss anything?

That is the change "I plan to do in separate PRs". Just want to double check if you have any concerns of removing that from the CI?

[yuwenma]

Move ./go/api to ./api (this dir includes Kptfile schema)

IIUC the plan is to use this repo to host TS and golang SDK. The stuff under go/api is not defined in a IDL, it is the golang language binding for Kptfile. What if we have the TS language binding for Kptfile in the future? Where should it live? So IMO go/api is a reasonable location.

TS, golang and Starlark. kustomize plans to remove starlark support. So we should consider our own starlark support to make it meet the bar for our SDK users.

moved to go/api

[mengqiy]

That is the change "I plan to do in separate PRs". Just want to double check if you have any concerns of removing that from the CI?

I see.

disable the node-ci since we do not have plan to modify typescript in short term.

This doesn't sound like a good reason to disable the node CI. Why not just leave it there?

[mengqiy]

One minor comment, otherwise LGTM

[yuwenma]

That is the change "I plan to do in separate PRs". Just want to double check if you have any concerns of removing that from the CI?

I see.

disable the node-ci since we do not have plan to modify typescript in short term.

This doesn't sound like a good reason to disable the node CI. Why not just leave it there?

yeah, after renaming those typescript workflow, agree it's better to leave it there.