Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transparent skaffold init #1273

Closed
dgageot opened this issue Nov 15, 2018 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5186
Closed

Transparent skaffold init #1273

dgageot opened this issue Nov 15, 2018 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5186
Assignees
Labels
area/dev area/init kind/feature-request priority/p3 agreed that this would be good to have, but no one is available at the moment.

Comments

@dgageot
Copy link
Contributor

dgageot commented Nov 15, 2018

When no skaffold configuration is found on disk, maybe we could run skaffold init in memory and use that.
I think it would be a very simple way of getting started with Skaffold and also a good way of supporting things like compose files transparently.
We’d, of course, print a warning to explain what’s going on and which configuration Skaffold is using.

@nkubala nkubala self-assigned this Nov 16, 2018
@dgageot dgageot removed the build/jib label Jan 19, 2019
@tejal29 tejal29 added the priority/p3 agreed that this would be good to have, but no one is available at the moment. label Aug 21, 2019
@tejal29
Copy link
Member

tejal29 commented Aug 21, 2019

@TadCordle, since you are the init expert, let us know if this is something you are interested in implementing this.

@dgageot
Copy link
Contributor Author

dgageot commented Apr 30, 2020

Hi everyone, I'm going to close this one since we didn't see a lot of demand and we do not plan on working on that subject anytime soon. Feel free to reopen if you really want that feature to be implemented.

@dgageot dgageot closed this as completed Apr 30, 2020
@balopat
Copy link
Contributor

balopat commented Jun 1, 2020

I'd reopen this, as the lack of signal here doesn't mean it would help a lot of people.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/dev area/init kind/feature-request priority/p3 agreed that this would be good to have, but no one is available at the moment.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants