Refactor character encoding method usage #32
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit simplifies the usage of character encoding methods. StandardCharsets.UTF_8.name() was replaced by StandardCharsets.UTF_8 in several places. This was done to improve code readability since StandardCharsets.UTF_8.name() and StandardCharsets.UTF_8 essentially do the same thing. Additionally, try-catch block related to encoding in RequestReceiver class has been removed since the encoding method used will not throw an exception, therefore the block was redundant.
hduelme
force-pushed
the
Refactor-character-encoding-method-usage
branch
from
2167619
to
fac2a3c
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit simplifies the usage of character encoding methods. StandardCharsets.UTF_8.name() was replaced by StandardCharsets.UTF_8 in several places. This was done to improve code readability since StandardCharsets.UTF_8.name() and StandardCharsets.UTF_8 essentially do the same thing. Additionally, try-catch block related to encoding in RequestReceiver class has been removed since the encoding method used will not throw an exception, therefore the block was redundant.