Content Packs v2 - Meta Issue

[lennartkoopmann]

This issue collects all issues related to the next version of content packs.

• "Support parameterized content packs" Support parameterized content packs #4224
• "Support views in content packs" Support Views in content packs #4223
• "Support processing pipelines in content packs" Support processing pipelines in content packs #4222
• "Allow plugins to support content packs" Allow plugins to support content packs #4221
• "Support version contraints for content packs" Support version contraints for content packs #4220
• "Better process to update content packs" Better process to update content packs #3517
• "Processing Pipelines cannot be included in Content Packs" Processing Pipelines cannot be included in Content Packs #2507 Support processing pipelines in content packs #4222
• "Content Pack rollback does not rollback the Grok Patterns" Content Pack rollback does not rollback the Grok Patterns. #2189
• "Alerts configuration is not saved when creating a content pack for a stream" Alerts configuration is not saved when creating a content pack for a stream.  #1758
• "Web UI: Make contents of imported content packs inspectable" Web UI: Make contents of imported content packs inspectable #1653
• "Include licenses in content packs v2?" https://github.com/Graylog2/graylog-plugin-license/issues/34

[dennisoelkers]

I think we should turn this into a project, this is what they are for.

[dennisoelkers]

I added a project for this: https://github.com/orgs/Graylog2/projects/2. Is there any benefit to keep this open?

[bernd]

@dennisoelkers I am fine with closing this one in favor of the project. 👍

[etienne-napoleone]

I can't find this project, where is it currently tracked?