Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #11

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2024
Merged

Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #11

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jun 21, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • In the Run scan step, the modification with sed -r 's/\x1b\[[0-9;]*m//g' in the tee command may cause issues, especially since interpreting escape sequences for colors may be necessary for readability. This modification could unintentionally affect the log file's formatting or the ability to interpret certain information in the log.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • It's recommended to ensure that any modifications made to the log output with sed do not strip necessary formatting or critical information needed for understanding the output. Consider a careful evaluation of what is being stripped before applying this modification.

Copy link

👋 Hi there!

  1. Add proper completion to the last line: "Infisical secrets check: Secrets check cancelled!"
  2. Ensure consistent formatting for the failure message: "Infisical secrets check: Secrets leaked!"
  3. Make sure the Sed expression is correct for removing ANSI escape codes in the log file.

The description could be more helpful.


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

Copy link

@senior-dev-bot senior-dev-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback from Senior Dev Bot

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 31 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13c6636 and 1c12f49.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Jun 21, 2024

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Summary of Incoming Changes

  • ✅ Corrects the logging output by removing ANSI color codes using sed.
  • 🤪 Fixes a typo in the failure message by removing an extra period.

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 🤪Typo Extra period in the failure message. 🟡Low 🟡Low

Issue 1: Extra Period in Failure Message

Details: The original failure message contains an extra period at the end, making it grammatically incorrect.
File Path: .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
Lines of Code: 64

Explanation

The failure message in the original file ends with an extra period, which is unnecessary and incorrect.

Code to Address the Issue

-            **Infisical secrets check:** :rotating_light: Secrets leaked!.     
+            **Infisical secrets check:** :rotating_light: Secrets leaked!     

Fix Explanation:
The extra period at the end of the failure message has been removed to correct the typo.

General Review of Code Quality and Style

The changes are minimal but effective. They:

  1. Improve the readability of the log file by removing ANSI color codes.
  2. Correct a minor typo in the failure message.

The code quality is good, and the style is consistent with the original file. The most important issue was the typo, which has been addressed. No major issues were found.

Yours, Gooroo.dev
Got thoughts? Don't hesitate to reply or add a reaction.

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 21, 2024

Copy link

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

11:10PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:10PM INF 14 commits scanned.
11:10PM INF scan completed in 60.9ms
11:10PM INF no leaks found

@guibranco guibranco merged commit de1b3fc into main Jun 21, 2024
7 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch June 21, 2024 23:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant