Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Real "white-label" service (different from orig. white label idea) #479

Closed
lefnire opened this issue Feb 21, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed

Real "white-label" service (different from orig. white label idea) #479

lefnire opened this issue Feb 21, 2013 · 5 comments

Comments

@lefnire
Copy link
Contributor

lefnire commented Feb 21, 2013

Ok, I'm starting to realize I may habe been using "white-label" wrong all along, lol. Someone had this recommendation:

I have one question. Is there any plans for using habitrpg as service for another sites or games?
What do I mean.

  1. Assume I have some simple mobile game like match tree or I have some site like reddit.
  2. I create account on habitrpg for this game or site, for example RedditRPG.
  3. Next I create some tasks like "Next 100 commet points" or "1000 karma points for one post"
  4. User can join any of this registered games of sites, but all this tasks are readonly.
  5. When user complete any task, site change his status via API.

I'll put t in Trello if it gets some traction and gets fleshed out. Pretty good idea, actually - but may take quite some effort

@Pandoro
Copy link

Pandoro commented Feb 21, 2013

If I get the idea right, that would mean you would need some admin view for
the owner of the originial service, where this person could set up all
these things and for each site you would have to do an individual api
integration. However I could imagine that if the money is right, this could
very well work out.

I am wondering though who will actually use this for their site? Right now
let's be fair. HabitRPG has grown rapidly, but we don't have the huge
community just yet, where any site or service owner can assume people
already have an account. So it remains to be seen if anyone who would set
this up for their service would actually get a lot of the users to use it.

The other version of the white-label approach, namely use it in classrooms
or businesses does not suffer from this approach, as if someone sets this
up for their company, they can just force all the employees to work with it
;)

So for the time being I am a bit sceptical about how often this version
will actually be requested. Once we hit the size of facebook, I have no
doubt this will be the case :D Can you already see the button everywhere?
Next to the share on facebook, tweet, blog and mail buttons. An add this as
todo on HabitRPG button :D

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Tyler Renelle notifications@github.comwrote:

Ok, I'm starting to realize I may habe been using "white-label" wrong all
along, lol. Someone had this recommendation:

I have one question. Is there any plans for using habitrpg as service for
another sites or games?
What do I mean.

  1. Assume I have some simple mobile game like match tree or I have some
    site like reddit.
  2. I create account on habitrpg for this game or site, for example
    RedditRPG.
  3. Next I create some tasks like "Next 100 commet points" or "1000 karma
    points for one post"
  4. User can join any of this registered games of sites, but all this tasks
    are readonly.
  5. When user complete any task, site change his status via API.

I'll put t in Trello if it gets some traction and gets fleshed out. Pretty
good idea, actually - but may take quite some effort


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/479.

@wc8
Copy link
Contributor

wc8 commented Feb 23, 2013

👍 for Add this as a todo on HabitRPG button ;-)

@Pandoro
Copy link

Pandoro commented Mar 3, 2013

Cross mentioning #25 for organization.

@deilann
Copy link
Contributor

deilann commented Feb 5, 2014

Hey @lefnire This seems kind of out-dated... can it be closed?

@lefnire
Copy link
Contributor Author

lefnire commented Feb 5, 2014

yeah, let's close and follow up on Trello. Org plans are pretty much in the wild, and any future additions will be Trello / email convos

@lefnire lefnire closed this as completed Feb 5, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants