Add support second-level granularity to injectTimes

[yykcool]

Description

Linked issue: None

Problem
seconds from Datetime objects passed into injectTime setting is currently ignored by the date picker

Changes
added support for seconds, changed doc-site example to reflect it, and added 1 test as well.

also corrected timeIntervals to intervals on existing tests found in inject_times_test.test.js to account for the fact that timeIntervals does not exist as a parameter, and the correct one should be intervals instead

Contribution checklist

• I have followed the contributing guidelines.
• I have added sufficient test coverage for my changes.
• I have formatted my code with Prettier and checked for linting issues with ESLint for code readability.

[pullrequest]

✅ This pull request was sent to the PullRequest network for review. Expert reviewers are now being matched to your request based on the code's requirements. Stay tuned!

What to expect from this code review:

• Comments posted to any areas of potential concern or improvement.
• Detailed feedback or actions needed to resolve issues that are found.
• Turnaround times vary, but we aim to be swift.

---

@yykcool you can click here to see the review status or cancel the code review job.

[pullrequest]

PullRequest Breakdown

Reviewable lines of change

+ 54
- 11

51% JavaScript (tests)
48% JavaScript
2% Other

Type of change

Feature - These changes are adding a new feature or improvement to existing code.

[pullrequest]

This change looks good - no major issues that I could find.

Jacques

---

Reviewed with ❤️ by PullRequest

[pullrequest]

This PR looks good to me overall for adding support for seconds. I had two comments for minor adjustments that need to be made below, but overall I didn't notice any major issues here.

Thanks for taking care of this!

Ryan

---

Reviewed with ❤️ by PullRequest

[martijnrusschen]

Please fix the test case comments

[yykcool]

comments are addressed

[martijnrusschen]

Can you make sure to merge with the latest main branch to upload the code coverage file?

[yykcool]

it seems like things are already up to date (tried to do a merge from the main branch), is there anything i might have missed?

[martijnrusschen]

can you try again?

[yykcool]

done

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.00%. Comparing base (f81afc4) to head (8ae5a60).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4683   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.00%   97.00%           
=======================================
  Files          28       28           
  Lines        2635     2638    +3     
  Branches     1133     1116   -17     
=======================================
+ Hits         2556     2559    +3     
  Misses         79       79           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.