We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'm not sure how long this has been broken but it is certainly a regression.
C:\build>\test-install\wsjtx-dev\Release64\bin\rigctl-wsjtx.exe -m2 f m 433550000 FM 15000
C:\build>\test-install\wsjtx-dev\Release64\bin\rigctl-wsjtx.exe -m2 m f FM 15000 0 73 Bill G4WJS.
Hi all,
relevant debug trace from rigctl; rigctl_parse.c(1992):rigctl_get_freq entered rig_get_freq called vfo=currVFO vfo_fixup: vfo=currVFO, vfo_curr=currVFO vfo_fixup: Leaving currVFO alone rig.c(1520):rig_get_cache entered rig_get_cache: vfo=currVFO, current_vfo=currVFO rig_get_cache: vfo=VFOA, freq=0 rig.c(1629):rig_get_cache return(0) rig_get_freq: cache check1 age=161ms rig_get_freq: currVFO cache hit age=161ms, freq=0 rig.c(1984):rig_get_freq return(0) 0 rigctl_parse.c(2018):rigctl_get_freq return(0) rigctl_parse: vfo_opt=0 rigctl_parse: retcode=0 rigctl_parse.c(1743):rigctl_parse return(0) and from rigctld:
icom.c(2095):icom_get_mode return(0) rig_get_mode: retcode after get_mode=0 rig_get_mode(2326): debug rig.c(1353):set_cache_mode entered rig.c(1417):set_cache_mode return(0) rig.c(2341):rig_get_mode return(0) rigctl_parse.c(2152):rigctl_get_mode return(0) rigctl_parse: vfo_opt=0 rigctl_parse: retcode=0 sync_callback: client lock disengaged rigctl_parse.c(1743):rigctl_parse return(0) handle_socket: doing rigctl_parse vfo_mode=0 rigctl_parse.c(648):rigctl_parse entered rigctl_parse: called, interactive=1 rigctl_parse: cmd==0x0a rigctl_parse: cmd=q(71) rigctl_parse: cmd==0x71 rigctl_parse: vfo_opt=0 rigctl_parse: quit returning NETRIGCTL_RET 0 rigctl_parse.c(799):rigctl_parse return(1) handle_socket: rigctl_parse retcode=1 Connection closed from Bills_Lenovo:38553 Note that the frequency request is never passed to the server end.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fix caching error -- check value instead of pointer....duh....
b849e00
#694
No branches or pull requests
I'm not sure how long this has been broken but it is certainly a regression.
C:\build>\test-install\wsjtx-dev\Release64\bin\rigctl-wsjtx.exe -m2 f m
433550000
FM
15000
C:\build>\test-install\wsjtx-dev\Release64\bin\rigctl-wsjtx.exe -m2 m f
FM
15000
0
73
Bill
G4WJS.
Hi all,
relevant debug trace from rigctl;
rigctl_parse.c(1992):rigctl_get_freq entered
rig_get_freq called vfo=currVFO
vfo_fixup: vfo=currVFO, vfo_curr=currVFO
vfo_fixup: Leaving currVFO alone
rig.c(1520):rig_get_cache entered
rig_get_cache: vfo=currVFO, current_vfo=currVFO
rig_get_cache: vfo=VFOA, freq=0
rig.c(1629):rig_get_cache return(0)
rig_get_freq: cache check1 age=161ms
rig_get_freq: currVFO cache hit age=161ms, freq=0
rig.c(1984):rig_get_freq return(0)
0
rigctl_parse.c(2018):rigctl_get_freq return(0)
rigctl_parse: vfo_opt=0
rigctl_parse: retcode=0
rigctl_parse.c(1743):rigctl_parse return(0)
and from rigctld:
icom.c(2095):icom_get_mode return(0)
rig_get_mode: retcode after get_mode=0
rig_get_mode(2326): debug
rig.c(1353):set_cache_mode entered
rig.c(1417):set_cache_mode return(0)
rig.c(2341):rig_get_mode return(0)
rigctl_parse.c(2152):rigctl_get_mode return(0)
rigctl_parse: vfo_opt=0
rigctl_parse: retcode=0
sync_callback: client lock disengaged
rigctl_parse.c(1743):rigctl_parse return(0)
handle_socket: doing rigctl_parse vfo_mode=0
rigctl_parse.c(648):rigctl_parse entered
rigctl_parse: called, interactive=1
rigctl_parse: cmd==0x0a
rigctl_parse: cmd=q(71)
rigctl_parse: cmd==0x71
rigctl_parse: vfo_opt=0
rigctl_parse: quit returning NETRIGCTL_RET 0
rigctl_parse.c(799):rigctl_parse return(1)
handle_socket: rigctl_parse retcode=1
Connection closed from Bills_Lenovo:38553
Note that the frequency request is never passed to the server end.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: