Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Remove "plain wrong" statement about sub-clock partition interval
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
henrikt-ma committed Nov 25, 2020
1 parent 0a31911 commit e3db6f6
Showing 1 changed file with 0 additions and 1 deletion.
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion chapters/synchronous.tex
Expand Up @@ -1012,7 +1012,6 @@ \subsection{Sub-clock Partitioning}\label{sub-clock-partitioning}
\subsection{Sub-clock Inferencing}\label{sub-clock-inferencing}

For each base-clock partition, the base interval needs to be determined and for each sub-clock partition, the sub-sampling factors and shift need to be determined.
For each sub-clock partition, the interval might be rational or \lstinline!Real! type and known or parameter expression or being unspecified. % This sentence is impossible to parse!
The sub-clock partition intervals are constrained by \lstinline!subSample! and \lstinline!superSample! factors which might be known (or parameter expression) or unspecified, as well as by \lstinline!shiftSample!, \lstinline!shiftCounter! and \lstinline!resolution!, or \lstinline!backSample!, \lstinline!backCounter! and \lstinline!resolution!.
This constraint set is used to solve for all intervals and sub-sampling factors and shift of the sub-clock partitions.
The model is erroneous if no solution exist.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit e3db6f6

Please sign in to comment.