New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added Config in Old Style/New Style of devotion. #209
Conversation
Old Style: The reflect damage will return in redeemer. New Style: The reflect damage will return in damager. Credits to brathena. Signed-off-by: Jedzkie <jedzkie13@rocketmail.com>
Oh my, i got compile errors :( |
status_change_end(target, SC_CHASEWALK, INVALID_TIMER); | ||
status_change_end(target, SC_CAMOUFLAGE, INVALID_TIMER); | ||
status_change_end(target, SC__INVISIBILITY, INVALID_TIMER); | ||
status_change_end(target, SC_DEEP_SLEEP, INVALID_TIMER); | ||
if ((sce=sc->data[SC_ENDURE]) && !sce->val4 && !sc->data[SC_LKCONCENTRATION]) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did u changed spaces for tabs or vice versa?
yes, i changed it. |
devs will kill u :P they like tabs since most of the code use tab for indentation and you changed it for spaces, but lets wait them to say, I was just stating this because they told me already to not do this when doing pull requests |
oh i misunderstood your question, i use tab for that, i know devs use tabs LOL |
Nvm then xd
|
I fixed now the compile warnings, hope the devs will merge my pull req :) |
can someone test this please? thank you! |
Old Style: The reflect damage will return in redeemer.
New Style: The reflect damage will return in damager.
Credits to brathena.
Signed-off-by: Jedzkie jedzkie13@rocketmail.com