-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
/
Equivalences.v
618 lines (518 loc) · 18.8 KB
/
Equivalences.v
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
Require Export Paths Fibrations Contractible.
(* Homotopy equivalences are a central concept in homotopy type theory.
Before we define equivalences, let us consider when [A] and [B]
should be considered "the same".
The first option is to require existence of [f : A -> B] and [g : B -> A]
which are inverses of each other, up to homotopy. Homotopically speaking, we
should also require a certain condition which is remniscent of the triangle
identities for adjunctions in category theory. Thus we call this notion an
adjoint equivalence.
The second option is to use Vladimir Voevodsky's definition of an
equivalence as a map whose homotopy fibers are contractible.
An interesting third options was suggested by André Joyal: a map [f] which
has separate left and right homotopy inverses. This too turns out to be
reasonable.
We shall start with the seconnd option. We will then show how the other
two are related to it. *)
(** An equivalence is a map whose homotopy fibers are contractible. *)
Definition is_equiv {A B} (e : A -> B) := forall y : B, is_contr (hfiber e y).
(** [equiv A B] is the space of equivalences from [A] to [B]. It is defined
as a structure rather than a total space because this allows us to use
Coq's canonical structures. Also notice that we have a coercion of
an equivalence to a map.
The disadvantage of using a structure is that various theorems about
total spaces cannot be used directly on the structure.
*)
Structure equiv (A B : Type) := {
equiv_map :> A -> B ;
equiv_is_equiv : is_equiv equiv_map
}.
Implicit Arguments equiv_map [A B].
Implicit Arguments equiv_is_equiv [A B].
Notation "A <~> B" := (equiv A B) (at level 85).
(** printing <~> $\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow}$ *)
(** The identity map is an equivalence. *)
Definition idequiv A : A <~> A.
Proof.
exists (idmap A).
intros x.
exists (existT (fun x' => x' = x) x (idpath x)).
intros [x' p].
unfold idmap in p.
induction p.
auto.
Defined.
(** We first define the inverse map and only show that it is an
equivalence later on, when we are ready to do it. *)
Let inverse {A B : Type} (e : A <~> B) : (B -> A) :=
fun y => pr1 (pr1 (equiv_is_equiv e y)).
(** printing ^-1 $^{-1}$ *)
Notation "e ^-1" := (inverse e) (at level 33).
(** The extracted map in the inverse direction is actually an inverse
(up to homotopy, of course). *)
Definition inverse_is_section {A B : Type} (e : A <~> B) (y : B) : e (e^-1 y) = y :=
pr2 (pr1 ((equiv_is_equiv e) y)).
Hint Rewrite @inverse_is_section : paths.
Definition inverse_is_retraction {A B : Type} (e : A <~> B) (x : A) : e^-1 (e x) = x :=
!base_path (pr2 (equiv_is_equiv e (e x)) (x ; idpath (e x))).
Hint Rewrite @inverse_is_retraction : paths.
Definition map_equiv_o_inverse {A B : Type} (e : A <~> B) (x y : A) (p : x = y) :
map (e^-1) (map e p) = inverse_is_retraction e x @ p @ !inverse_is_retraction e y.
Proof.
path_induction.
hott_simpl.
Defined.
Hint Rewrite @map_equiv_o_inverse : paths.
Definition map_inverse_o_equiv {A B : Type} (e : A <~> B) (u v : B) (p : u = v) :
map e (map (e^-1) p) = inverse_is_section e u @ p @ !inverse_is_section e v.
Proof.
path_induction.
hott_simpl.
Defined.
Hint Rewrite @map_inverse_o_equiv : paths.
(** Here are some tactics to use for canceling inverses, and for introducing them. *)
(** Here is a tactic which helps us prove that a homotopy fiber is
contractible. This will be useful for showing that maps are
equivalences. *)
Ltac contract_hfiber y p :=
match goal with
| [ |- is_contr (@hfiber _ _ ?f ?x) ] =>
eexists (existT (fun z => f z = x) y p);
let z := fresh "z" in
let q := fresh "q" in
intros [z q]
end.
(** Let us explain the tactic. It accepts two arguments [y] and [p]
and attempts to contract a homotopy fiber to [existT _ y p]. It
first looks for a goal of the form [is_contr (hfiber f x)], where
the question marks in [?f] and [?x] are pattern variables that Coq
should match against the actual values. If the goal is found, then
we use [eexists] to specify that the center of retraction is at the
element [existT _ y p] of hfiber provided by the user. After that
we generate some fresh names and perfrom intros. *)
(* These tactics are obsolete now because rewriting can do them. *)
Ltac cancel_inverses_in s :=
match s with
| context cxt [ equiv_map _ _ ?w (inverse ?w ?x) ] =>
let mid := context cxt [ x ] in
path_using mid inverse_is_section
| context cxt [ inverse ?w (equiv_map ?w ?x) ] =>
let mid := context cxt [ x ] in
path_using mid inverse_is_retraction
end.
Ltac cancel_inverses :=
repeat progress (
match goal with
| |- ?s = ?t => first [ cancel_inverses_in s | cancel_inverses_in t ]
end
).
(* The following tactics are useful for manipulation of equivalences. *)
Ltac expand_inverse_src w x :=
match goal with
| |- ?s = ?t =>
match s with
| context cxt [ x ] =>
first [
let mid := context cxt [ w (inverse w x) ] in
path_via' mid;
[ path_simplify' inverse_is_section | ]
|
let mid := context cxt [ inverse w (w x) ] in
path_via' mid;
[ path_simplify' inverse_is_retraction | ]
]
end
end.
Ltac expand_inverse_trg w x :=
match goal with
| |- ?s = ?t =>
match t with
| context cxt [ x ] =>
first [
let mid := context cxt [ w (inverse w x) ] in
path_via' mid;
[ | path_simplify' inverse_is_section ]
|
let mid := context cxt [ inverse w (w x) ] in
path_via' mid;
[ | path_simplify' inverse_is_retraction ]
]
end
end.
(** These tactics change between goals of the form [w x = y] and the
form [x = w^-1 y], and dually. *)
Ltac equiv_moveright :=
match goal with
| |- equiv_map ?w ?a = ?b =>
apply @concat with (y := w (inverse w b));
[ apply map | apply inverse_is_section ]
| |- (inverse ?w) ?a = ?b =>
apply @concat with (y := inverse w (w b));
[ apply map | apply inverse_is_retraction ]
end.
Ltac equiv_moveleft :=
match goal with
| |- ?a = equiv_map ?w ?b =>
apply @concat with (y := w (inverse w a));
[ apply opposite, inverse_is_section | apply map ]
| |- ?a = (inverse ?w) ?b =>
apply @concat with (y := inverse w (w a));
[ apply opposite, inverse_is_retraction | apply map ]
end.
(** Equivalences are "injective on paths". *)
Lemma equiv_injective {A B : Type} (e : A <~> B) x y : (e x = e y) -> (x = y).
Proof.
intro p.
expand_inverse_src e x.
equiv_moveright.
exact p.
Defined.
(** Anything contractible is equivalent to the unit type. *)
Lemma contr_equiv_unit (A : Type) :
is_contr A -> (A <~> unit).
Proof.
intros [x h].
exists (fun x => tt).
intro y; destruct y.
contract_hfiber x (idpath tt).
apply @total_path with (p := h z).
simpl.
apply contr_path2.
auto.
Defined.
(** And conversely, anything equivalent to a contractible type is
contractible. *)
Lemma contr_equiv_contr (A B : Type) :
A <~> B -> is_contr A -> is_contr B.
Proof.
intros f [x p].
exists (f x).
intro y.
equiv_moveleft.
apply p.
Defined.
(** The free path space of a type is equivalent to the type itself. *)
Definition free_path_space A := {xy : A * A & fst xy = snd xy}.
Definition free_path_source A : free_path_space A <~> A.
Proof.
exists (fun p => fst (projT1 p)).
intros x.
eexists (existT _ (existT (fun (xy : A * A) => fst xy = snd xy) (x,x) (idpath x)) _).
intros [[[u v] p] q].
simpl in * |- *.
induction q as [a].
induction p as [b].
apply idpath.
Defined.
Definition free_path_target A : free_path_space A <~> A.
Proof.
exists (fun p => snd (projT1 p)).
intros x.
eexists (existT _ (existT (fun (xy : A * A) => fst xy = snd xy) (x,x) (idpath x)) _).
intros [[[u v] p] q].
simpl in * |- *.
induction q as [a].
induction p as [b].
apply idpath.
Defined.
(** We have proven that every equivalence has an inverse up to
homotopy. In fact, having an inverse up to homotopy is also
enough to characterize a map as being an equivalence. However,
the data of an inverse up to homotopy is not equivalent to the
data in [equiv] unless we add one more piece of coherence data.
This is a homotopy version of the category-theoretic notion of
"adjoint equivalence". *)
Structure adjoint_equiv A B := {
adj_map : A -> B ;
adj_adjoint : B -> A ;
adj_is_section : (forall y, adj_map (adj_adjoint y) = y) ;
adj_is_retraction : (forall x, adj_adjoint (adj_map x) = x) ;
adj_triangle : (forall x, map adj_map (adj_is_retraction x) = adj_is_section (adj_map x))
}.
(** The following property of equivalences serves to show that an
equivalence is an adjoint equivalences. It is a triangle identity but
it does not look like one since we have inserted one of the
homotopies. *)
Definition inverse_triangle {A B : Type} (e : A <~> B) x :
(map e (inverse_is_retraction e x)) = (inverse_is_section e (e x)).
Proof.
unfold inverse_is_retraction.
hott_simpl.
apply (concat (!idpath_right_unit _ _ _ _)).
hott_simpl.
moveright_onleft.
Defined.
(** An equivalence is an adjoint equivalence and vice versa. *)
Definition equiv_to_adjoint {A B} (e : A <~> B) : adjoint_equiv A B :=
{|
adj_map := e ;
adj_adjoint := e^-1 ;
adj_is_section := inverse_is_section e ;
adj_is_retraction := inverse_is_retraction e ;
adj_triangle := inverse_triangle e |}.
Theorem adjoint_to_equiv {A B} : adjoint_equiv A B -> A <~> B.
Proof.
intros [f g is_section is_retraction natural].
exists f.
intro y.
contract_hfiber (g y) (is_section y).
apply (@total_path _
(fun x => f x = y)
(existT _ z q)
(existT _ (g y) (is_section y))
(!is_retraction z @ (map g q))).
simpl.
path_via (!(map f (!is_retraction z @ map g q)) @ q).
apply transport_hfiber.
hott_simpl.
(** Here is where we use triangle. *)
path_via (!map f (map g q) @ is_section (f z) @ q).
(** Now it's just naturality of 'is_section'. *)
associate_right.
moveright_onleft.
undo_compose_map.
apply opposite, homotopy_naturality_toid with (f := f o g).
hott_simpl.
Defined.
Lemma adjoint_to_equiv_compute_map {A B} (e : adjoint_equiv A B) :
equiv_map (adjoint_to_equiv e) = adj_map _ _ e.
Proof.
destruct e; apply idpath.
Defined.
(** In fact, [equiv_to_adjoint] and [adjoint_to_equiv] are
inverse equivalences, but proving this requires function
extensionality. See [FunextEquivalences.v]. *)
(** It is sometimes easier to define an adjoint equivalence than
an equivalence, for example when we have a map which is homotopic
to the identity. *)
Lemma equiv_pointwise_idmap A (f : A -> A) (p : forall x, f x = x) : A <~> A.
Proof.
apply adjoint_to_equiv.
refine {| adj_map := f; adj_adjoint := idmap A; adj_is_section := p; adj_is_retraction := p |}.
apply htoid_well_pointed.
Defined.
(** The third notion of "equivalence" is that of a map which has an inverse up
to homotopy but without the triangle identity (so it is a kind of
"incoherent" adjoint equivalence. Let us call such a thing an h-equivalence
or just [hequiv] for short. *)
Structure hequiv A B := {
hequiv_map : A -> B ;
hequiv_inverse : B -> A ;
hequiv_section : (forall y, hequiv_map (hequiv_inverse y) = y) ;
hequiv_retraction : (forall x, hequiv_inverse (hequiv_map x) = x)
}.
(** A central fact about adjoint equivalences is that any "incoherent"
equivalence can be improved to an adjoint equivalence by changing one of the
natural isomorphisms. We now prove a corresponding result in homotopy type
theory. The proof is exactly the same as the usual proof for adjoint
equivalences in 2-category theory. *)
Lemma map_retraction_section A B (f : A -> B) (g : B -> A)
(h : forall x, f (g x) = x) (u v : B) (p : u = v) :
map f (map g p) = h u @ p @ ! h v.
Proof.
path_induction.
hott_simpl.
Defined.
Definition adjointify {A B} : hequiv A B -> adjoint_equiv A B.
Proof.
intros [f g is_section is_retraction].
(* We have to redefine one of the two homotopies. *)
set (is_retraction' := fun x =>
( map g (map f (!is_retraction x)))
@ (map g (is_section (f x)))
@ (is_retraction x)).
refine {|
adj_map := f;
adj_adjoint := g;
adj_is_section := is_section;
adj_is_retraction := is_retraction' |}.
intro x.
(** Now we just play with naturality until things cancel. *)
unfold is_retraction'.
hott_simpl.
associate_right.
moveright_onleft.
rewrite map_retraction_section with (h := is_section).
hott_simpl.
set (q := map f (is_retraction x)).
moveright_onleft.
associate_left.
moveleft_onright.
rewrite <- compose_map.
exact (homotopy_naturality_fromid B _ (fun y => ! is_section y) _ _ _).
Defined.
Lemma adjointify_compute_map {A B} (h : hequiv A B) :
hequiv_map _ _ h = adj_map _ _ (adjointify h).
Proof.
destruct h; apply idpath.
Defined.
(** Therefore, "any h-equivalence is an equivalence." *)
Definition hequiv_to_equiv {A B} : hequiv A B -> (A <~> B) :=
adjoint_to_equiv o adjointify.
Lemma hequiv_to_equiv_compute_map {A B} (h : hequiv A B) :
equiv_map (hequiv_to_equiv h) = hequiv_map _ _ h.
Proof.
destruct h; apply idpath.
Defined.
(** All sorts of nice things follow from this theorem. *)
(** A lemma for showing that if something is an [hequiv] then
it is an equivalence. *)
Definition is_equiv_from_hequiv {A B} {f : A -> B} (g : B -> A)
(p : forall y, f (g y) = y) (q : forall x, g (f x) = x) : is_equiv f :=
equiv_is_equiv (hequiv_to_equiv
{| hequiv_map := f ;
hequiv_inverse := g ;
hequiv_section := p ;
hequiv_retraction := q |}).
Definition equiv_from_hequiv {A B} (f : A -> B) (g : B -> A)
(p : forall y, f (g y) = y) (q : forall x, g (f x) = x) : A <~> B :=
hequiv_to_equiv
{| hequiv_map := f;
hequiv_inverse := g;
hequiv_section := p;
hequiv_retraction := q |}.
(** The inverse of an equivalence is an equivalence. *)
Lemma equiv_inverse {A B} : (A <~> B) -> B <~> A.
Proof.
intro e.
destruct (equiv_to_adjoint e) as [f g is_section is_retraction triangle].
apply (equiv_from_hequiv g f); auto.
Defined.
(* Rewrite rules for inverses. *)
Lemma equiv_inverse_is_inverse (A B : Type) (f : A <~> B) : equiv_map (equiv_inverse f) = f^-1.
Proof.
apply idpath.
Defined.
Hint Rewrite equiv_inverse_is_inverse : paths.
(** Anything homotopic to an equivalence is an equivalence. *)
Lemma equiv_homotopic {A B} (f : A -> B) (g : A <~> B) :
(forall x, f x = g x) -> A <~> B.
Proof.
intros p.
apply (equiv_from_hequiv f (g^-1)).
intro y.
rewrite p.
hott_simpl.
intro x.
equiv_moveright; auto.
Defined.
(** And the 2-out-of-3 property for equivalences. *)
Definition equiv_compose {A B C} (f : A <~> B) (g : B <~> C) : (A <~> C).
Proof.
apply (equiv_from_hequiv (g o f) (f^-1 o g^-1)); intro; unfold compose.
now equiv_moveright; apply inverse_is_section.
now equiv_moveright; apply inverse_is_retraction.
Defined.
Lemma equiv_inverse_compose (A B C : Type) (f : A <~> B) (g : B <~> C) x :
inverse (equiv_compose f g) x = f^-1 (g^-1 x).
Proof.
auto.
Defined.
Hint Rewrite equiv_inverse_compose : paths.
Definition equiv_cancel_right {A B C} (f : A <~> B) (g : B -> C) :
is_equiv (g o f) -> B <~> C.
Proof.
intros H.
pose (gof := {| equiv_map := g o f; equiv_is_equiv := H |}).
apply (equiv_from_hequiv g (f o gof^-1)).
intro y.
expand_inverse_trg gof y.
apply idpath.
intro x.
change (f (gof^-1 (g x)) = x).
equiv_moveright; equiv_moveright.
change (g x = g (f (f^-1 x))).
hott_simpl.
Defined.
Definition equiv_cancel_left {A B C} (f : A -> B) (g : B <~> C) :
is_equiv (g o f) -> A <~> B.
Proof.
intros H.
pose (gof := {| equiv_map := g o f; equiv_is_equiv := H |}).
apply (equiv_from_hequiv f (gof^-1 o g)).
intros y.
expand_inverse_trg g y.
expand_inverse_src g (f (((gof ^-1) o g) y)).
apply map.
path_via (gof ((gof^-1 (g y)))).
hott_simpl.
intros x.
path_via (gof^-1 (gof x)).
hott_simpl.
Defined.
(** André Joyal suggested the following definition of equivalences and to call
it "h-isomorphism" or [hiso] for short. This is even weaker than [hequiv] as
we have a separate section and a retraction. *)
Structure is_hiso {A B} (f : A -> B) :=
{ hiso_section : B -> A ;
hiso_is_section : (forall y, f (hiso_section y) = y) ;
hiso_retraction : B -> A ;
hiso_is_retraction : forall x, (hiso_retraction (f x) = x)
}.
Implicit Arguments hiso_section [A B f].
Implicit Arguments hiso_is_section [A B f].
Implicit Arguments hiso_retraction [A B f].
Implicit Arguments hiso_is_retraction [A B f].
Definition is_hiso_from_is_equiv {A B} (f : A -> B) : is_equiv f -> is_hiso f.
Proof.
intro feq.
pose (e := {| equiv_map := f; equiv_is_equiv := feq |}).
rewrite (idpath _ : f = equiv_map e).
refine {| hiso_section := e^-1; hiso_retraction := e^-1|}.
apply inverse_is_section.
apply inverse_is_retraction.
Defined.
Structure hiso A B :=
{ hiso_map :> A -> B ;
hiso_is_hiso :> is_hiso hiso_map
}.
(** Of course, an honest equivalence is an h-isomorphism. *)
Definition hiso_from_equiv {A B} (e : A <~> B) : hiso A B :=
{| hiso_map := equiv_map e ;
hiso_is_hiso :=
{| hiso_section := equiv_inverse e ;
hiso_is_section := inverse_is_section e ;
hiso_retraction := equiv_inverse e ;
hiso_is_retraction := inverse_is_retraction e
|}
|}.
(** But also an h-isomorphism is an equivalence. *)
Definition hequiv_from_hiso {A B} : hiso A B -> hequiv A B.
Proof.
intros [f [g G h H]].
refine {| hequiv_map := f ; hequiv_inverse := h |}.
intro y.
path_via (f (g y)).
apply map.
path_via (h (f (g y))).
(* Coq 8.3 wants this but 8.4 does not, so we try it. *)
try (apply map, opposite, G).
assumption.
Defined.
Lemma hequiv_from_hiso_compute_map {A B} (h : hiso A B) :
hequiv_map _ _ (hequiv_from_hiso h) = hiso_map _ _ h.
Proof.
destruct h as [? [? ? ?]].
apply idpath.
Defined.
Definition equiv_from_hiso {A B} (f : hiso A B) : A <~> B :=
hequiv_to_equiv (hequiv_from_hiso f).
Lemma equiv_from_hiso_compute_map {A B} (f : hiso A B) :
equiv_map (equiv_from_hiso f) = hiso_map _ _ f.
Proof.
destruct f as [? [? ? ?]].
apply idpath.
Defined.
Definition is_equiv_from_is_hiso {A B} (f : A -> B) : is_hiso f -> is_equiv f.
Proof.
intro fhiso.
pose (h := {| hiso_map := f; hiso_is_hiso := fhiso |}).
pose (e := equiv_from_hiso h).
(** We would like to apply [equiv_is_equiv e], but Coq wants us to rewrite first. *)
rewrite (idpath _ : f = hiso_map _ _ h).
rewrite <- (equiv_from_hiso_compute_map h).
apply (equiv_is_equiv e).
Defined.
(** Of course, the harder part is showing that being an h-isomorphism is a
proposition, and therefore equivalent to being an equivalence. This also
requires function extensionality; see [FunextEquivalences.v]. *)