Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: various tweaks. #16290

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 6, 2023
Merged

docs: various tweaks. #16290

merged 1 commit into from Dec 6, 2023

Conversation

MikeMcQuaid
Copy link
Member

Adjust various maintainer and contributor-focused documents after recent maintainer conversations and generally anything I noticed was wrong or outdated as I went through these.

@MikeMcQuaid MikeMcQuaid requested review from a team December 4, 2023 18:30
docs/Acceptable-Formulae.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Adjust various maintainer and contributor-focused documents after
recent maintainer conversations and generally anything I noticed was
wrong or outdated as I went through these.
@MikeMcQuaid MikeMcQuaid merged commit c9b667f into master Dec 6, 2023
26 of 27 checks passed
@MikeMcQuaid MikeMcQuaid deleted the docs branch December 6, 2023 19:47
Comment on lines +47 to +53
## 5. Slow Down

We're a volunteer-run open source project used by a lot of people. That can mean
that it feels like there's a lot of pressure to get a fix, package or project
completed ASAP. Try to not feel this pressure; slow down, focus on Homebrew
being enjoyable. If in doubt: over-communicate your decision making. A revert
can always be done now and a proper fix done tomorrow.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️

@@ -147,11 +143,11 @@ Sometimes we have to edit a `Makefile` on-the-fly to use our prefix for the Pyth

## Libraries

### Python declarations for libraries
Remember: there are very limited cases for libraries (e.g. significant amounts of native code is compiled) so, if in doubt, do not package them.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

In general, using GitHub's "Squash and Merge" button is the best way to merge a PR. This can be used when the PR modifies only one cask, regardless of the number of commits or whether the commit message format is correct. When merging using this method, the commit message can be modified if needed. Usually, version bump commit messages follow the form `Update CASK from OLD_VERSION to NEW_VERSION`.
In general, using GitHub's "Merge" button is the best way to merge a PR. This can be used when the PR modifies only one cask, regardless of the number of commits or whether the commit message format is correct. When merging using this method, the commit message can be modified if needed. Usually, version bump commit messages follow the form `Update CASK from OLD_VERSION to NEW_VERSION`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I realise this PR is already merged, but I wanted to clarify whether this paragraph still remains true after changing from 'Squash and Merge' to 'Merge'; as the latter parts of it seem directly related to a squash merge, not a normal merge?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah the paragraph isn't quite correct here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the outdated PR was locked due to age label Jan 13, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 13, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
outdated PR was locked due to age
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet