Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

audit: new formulae should not require patches. #2479

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 22, 2017

Conversation

MikeMcQuaid
Copy link
Member

We may under some circumstances accept these anyway but it's better to nudge people into the right behaviours on local audits.

@ilovezfs
Copy link
Contributor

ilovezfs commented Apr 11, 2017

Should this also check for patch do not just __END__?

@MikeMcQuaid
Copy link
Member Author

@ilovezfs My thought was that a patch do is more likely to be one that's actually upstream so might actually be OK. Thoughts?

@ilovezfs
Copy link
Contributor

That still seems like it should require someone here to take a second look since accepting new formulae with patches, even reported ones, is still sketchy. Also, the patch URL could be from a stale PR no one upstream ever acknowledged, a personal gist, an attachment to a bug report buried on Sourceforge, etc.

We may under some circumstances accept these anyway but it's better to
nudge people into the right behaviours on local `audit`s.
@MikeMcQuaid
Copy link
Member Author

Changed to check for any patches to any spec.

@MikeMcQuaid MikeMcQuaid merged commit 96ea979 into Homebrew:master Apr 22, 2017
@MikeMcQuaid MikeMcQuaid deleted the audit-new-formula-patches branch April 22, 2017 10:06
@ilovezfs
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

@Homebrew Homebrew locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 3, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants