deps: accept formula options.

[MikeMcQuaid]

Also, cleanup usage of <formula>.

As requested in comments of #5587.

CC @RandomDSdevel @blogabe

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same change?
• Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
• Have you written new tests for your changes? Here's an example.
• Have you successfully run brew style with your changes locally?
• Have you successfully run brew tests with your changes locally?

---

[blogabe]

cheers @MikeMcQuaid

[RandomDSdevel]

     Sorry for not acting on this, @MikeMcQuaid; I was waiting to see whether @blogabe was planning to tackle this or not.

[MikeMcQuaid]

No worries @RandomDSdevel!

[blogabe]

Hi guys!

I'm still confused about what this change was supposed to fix. Hoping you can help me understand. Prior to #5587, I was able to execute this command ( brew deps -n --include-build --include-requirements --include-optional <formula> <option1> <option 2> ) to get a list of the dependencies the as required by the formula and the options entered on the command line. Obviously this now only pertains to formulae on personal taps.

Since the above change and even after this change, the above command will print ALL optional dependencies effectively ignoring the options passed on the command line.

So if the formula by itself has no dependencies, option 1 depends on dep1, option 2 on dep2, and option 3 on dep3, I would expect the command to output dep1 and dep2 per the historical usage. but now it outputs dep1, 2, and 3 even though option 3 was never passed.

User error on my part? Am I misunderstanding what this change was supposed to do?

Mike, what happened to the other picture with your dog???

Thanks for your help guys. Appreciate it.

[blogabe]

Geez... I'm an idiot. Started messing around and realized the command does what I want if I simply remove the --include-optional parameter. Feel free to disregard my prior message.