New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Taps for Casks #12
Comments
Current search output (sample):
Here, There's possible non-intuitive behaviour when searching... Normal:
Search for "a":
Everything's here, including Search for "phinze":
Now, only the stuff in Regexp search:
Ooops, that doesn't return anything... which is perfectly normal, because neither Regexp search (proper):
And now it works! It matches Might not be completely intuitive, but I'll leave it like that for the moment. |
Thanks to some killer work by @passcod we can call this done. |
Currently, only merged-in casks can be installed, except if one edits the definitions straight from
Library/Taps/phinze-cask/Casks
, which is awkward. [Installing from URL (#6) would also add to the convenience.]I've started thinking (and am thinking of starting to code it up) about using plain Taps to add to the collection:
Currently, the only place we look in is
Taps/phinze-cask/Casks
. An easy way to add support without too much trouble is to just have normal taps, and when there's aCasks
directory within a tap, use that as well.So
Taps/passcod-example/*.rb
are regular Formulae, whileTaps/passcod-example/Casks/*.rb
are tapped casks. Plus,brew update
does the right thing, no work needed.There are a few things left to be worked out though, notably: what happens in case of duplicates across taps?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: