Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Java Cask with SDK Docs and JCE Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy Files #7064

Closed
mxsb opened this issue Oct 29, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@mxsb
Copy link

mxsb commented Oct 29, 2014

It would be cool if the Java Cask can be enhanced a bit, so that one can install the SDK docs and/or the JCE libs with the Java installation. @indrajitr did something like this in his personal Java SDK formula for Homebrew (see https://github.com/indrajitr/homebrew-personal/blob/master/Formula/java-sdk.rb).

Maybe you have a look at this improvement :) /cc @indrajitr

P.S.
Would be cool to have this feature in java6 and java7 available too...

@rolandwalker
Copy link
Contributor

Hi!

Thanks for the suggestion. That would be a nice feature, but we don't have that ability, because we can only specify a single URL per Cask.

The way this would be done currently would be to create a separate Cask for the SDK docs, which would be a welcome addition.

There is a plan to add dependencies, in which case a meta-Cask could be constructed for both the docs and the JDK.

@indrajitr
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @rolandwalker! Something like Resource block would be great.
For lack of anything similar, I had been trying to go back to the old ways (indrajitr/homebrew-personal@a7fc671) of doing it (via sub-formula).

But I don't see any other cask using this technique and am not even sure if that's the blessed of of doing it at the moment.

@copumpkin
Copy link

I'd like this too, for what it's worth

@Homebrew Homebrew locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 8, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants