Add structuredlogviewer (new cask)

[jwosty]

Important: Do not tick a checkbox if you haven’t performed its action. Honesty is indispensable for a smooth review process.

In the following questions <cask> is the token of the cask you're submitting.

After making any changes to a cask, existing or new, verify:

• The submission is for a stable version or documented exception.
• brew audit --cask --online <cask> is error-free.
• brew style --fix <cask> reports no offenses.

Additionally, if adding a new cask:

• Named the cask according to the token reference.
• Checked the cask was not already refused.
• Checked the cask is submitted to the correct repo.
• brew audit --new-cask <cask> worked successfully.
• brew install --cask <cask> worked successfully.
• brew uninstall --cask <cask> worked successfully.

Audit fails with a signature error because the author hasn't signed the app (see KirillOsenkov/MSBuildStructuredLog#686). There are no other errors.

audit for structuredlogviewer: failed
 - Signature verification failed:
/private/tmp/d20231004-26997-fa6qjl/StructuredLogViewer.app: rejected

macOS on ARM requires software to be signed.
Please contact the upstream developer to let them know they should sign and notarize their software.
structuredlogviewer
  * line 9, col 2: Signature verification failed:
    /private/tmp/d20231004-26997-fa6qjl/StructuredLogViewer.app: rejected
    
    macOS on ARM requires software to be signed.
    Please contact the upstream developer to let them know they should sign and notarize their software.
Error: 1 problem in 1 cask detected.

[jwosty]

No zaps are necessary; the app does not create any files that need uninstalling.

[miccal]

Thank you for your submission @jwosty, but we cannot accept it at this time because it does not pass our signature verification check that are a requirement for new submissions:

macOS on ARM requires software to be signed. Please contact the upstream developer to let them know they should sign and notarize their software.

Please consider hosting this in your own Tap and if the developers sign their app in the future we would then be happy to consider adding this to homebrew-cask.

[jwosty]

@miccal I see, thank you for letting me know. I've done this now (https://github.com/jwosty/homebrew-structuredlogviewer).

However the program can also be built as an executable with no app bundle - would distributing it as a formula be a viable alternative in the meantime, so users don't have to add a third-party tap?

[miccal]

However the program can also be built as an executable with no app bundle - would distributing it as a formula be a viable alternative in the meantime, so users don't have to add a third-party tap?

Yes, absolutely. Please feel free to submit a PR to the homebrew-core repository.