proxsuite 0.2.2 (new formula)

[jcarpent]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

[fxcoudert]

It fails on ARM (Apple Silicon) because it includes a x86-only header:

14/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/clang/14.0.0/include/mmintrin.h::214:: 2error: :"This header is only meant to be used on x86 and x64 architecture" 

And on Intel, the test fails:

  ==> Testing proxsuite
  ==> /usr/local/opt/python@3.10/libexec/bin/python -c import proxsuite
  qp = proxsuite.proxqp.dense.QP(10,0,0)
  assert qp.model.H.shape[0] == 10 and qp.model.H.shape[1] == 10
  Traceback (most recent call last):
  Error: test failed
    File "<string>", line 3, in <module>
  ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'numpy'

[jcarpent]

@fxcoudert @carlocab I've fixed the issue with @fabinsh to properly integrate ProxSuite within HomeBrew.
This PR is ready for review.

[jcarpent]

Thanks a lot @fxcoudert @carlocab for your time and help.

[jcarpent]

Thanks @SMillerDev for the feedback. I've handled most of them, except the one to properly find Simde.

[jcarpent]

@SMillerDev Thanks a lot for the review process.
Do you have in mind a timeline for releasing this package in the core of Homebrew?

[SMillerDev]

When it's done and reviewed

[chenrui333]

LGTM

[BrewTestBot]

@SMillerDev has triggered a merge.