pforth 28 (new formula) #57250
pforth 28 (new formula) #57250
Conversation
|
license audit failure which is expected (Homebrew/brew#7874) |
|
@SeekingMeaning thanks for the PR, can you rebase to the master? We have sorted out the CI issue. Thanks! |
| class Pforth < Formula | ||
| desc "Portable ANS-like Forth written in ANSI C" | ||
| homepage "http://www.softsynth.com/pforth/" | ||
| url "https://github.com/philburk/pforth/archive/d71efe1792a1414a5b102ae8e69f3913c70aa8b0.tar.gz" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is interesting, why does the upstream not like to make a release tag for the commit?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm should I ask about this in an issue on their repo?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, we require a tagged commit to release
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Another interesting thing to call out is the repo does not have OSS license either.
|
Going to mark the PR as |
|
Since it doesn't match https://docs.brew.sh/Acceptable-Formulae#stable-versions and https://docs.brew.sh/Acceptable-Formulae#we-dont-like-binary-formulae I'm just closing this. |
brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where<formula>is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew test <formula>, where<formula>is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict <formula>(after doingbrew install <formula>)?