with-readline 0.1.1 (new formula) #33454
Conversation
|
|
||
| test do | ||
| # Some test is better than no test | ||
| system bin/"with-readline", "--version" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you try and run an internal OS X command that doesn't have readline?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To test readline functionality, I need to figure out how to do interactive (like expect) in Ruby. I could just run with-readline sftp for example but that tells me no more than --version. I have however put in a test with the OSX-provided expect which does not link with readline.
|
@mistydemeo I stand corrected. readline builds and installs correctly without setting flags. Pushed updated formula. Thanks for the help and the patience. |
Adds a formula for with-readline which adds readline support to tools that don't have readline support like the OSX native sftp.
alephnull
force-pushed
the
adding-with-readline-formula
branch
from
e565862
to
a663cfa
Compare
| test do | ||
| # Some test is better than no test | ||
| system bin/"with-readline", "--version" | ||
| system bin/"echo 'exit' | with-readline expect" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test actually fails silently:
==> /usr/local/Cellar/with-readline/0.1.1/bin/echo 'exit' | with-readline expect
sh: /usr/local/Cellar/with-readline/0.1.1/bin/echo: No such file or directory
You can write this as system "echo 'exit' | #{bin}/with-readline /usr/bin/expect"
|
Pulled and test improved in 3cb2e79. |
Adds a formula for with-readline which adds readline support to tools
that don't have readline support like the OSX native sftp.
This depends on readline and fooling about with {C,LD}FLAGS was the
way I figured out to make this build. Criticism appreciated.