You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
View behavior helpers should accept a hash of operations and directly resort to the common operations if left unspecified. The common operations presume the view type when the helpers should be generic, but that's ok---caller beware.
We should not expect that the built-in binders will ever need to be undefined. If they do, the client can always delete them.
We can tolerate tighter coupling between the binding controller singleton and the built-in binders. No need for an html namespace; just attach the binders directly to the binding controller singleton.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Issue HotDrink#5
- All binders are in hd.binders.
- Assume that built-in binders will never need to be undefined.
- Custom binders can extend sub-contexts with custom values, e.g., $index.
- Binding controller is a singleton with two entries: hd.bind for users and
hd.subbind for binders.
- View behaviors use sensible defaults for view methods based on the
assumption that the view is an HTML widget.
View behavior helpers should accept a hash of operations and directly resort to the common operations if left unspecified. The common operations presume the view type when the helpers should be generic, but that's ok---caller beware.
We should not expect that the built-in binders will ever need to be undefined. If they do, the client can always delete them.
We can tolerate tighter coupling between the binding controller singleton and the built-in binders. No need for an html namespace; just attach the binders directly to the binding controller singleton.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: