Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

apply scheduling design and practices #5

Open
2 of 7 tasks
Huang-Wei opened this issue Nov 14, 2018 · 0 comments
Open
2 of 7 tasks

apply scheduling design and practices #5

Huang-Wei opened this issue Nov 14, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Huang-Wei
Copy link
Owner

Huang-Wei commented Nov 14, 2018

Matching incoming (Shared)LoadBalancer request to a real LoadBalancer is actually a scheduling/horizontal-auto-scaling problem.

  • horizontal auto scaling
    • if LoadBalancer resources are out of capacity, create one dynamically
    • if getting error on creating a LoadBalancer service, usually you ran out of capacity/quota in your account, then need to invoke IaaS SDK to increase quota for your account - maybe safer to do it manually by operator
  • scheduling predicates - filtering LB resources
    • ports conflict (implements Ports predicate #6)
    • protocol (TCP/UDP) matching?
    • service "requests/limits" (or simply use a "weight" term)
    • service "{anti-}affinity"
  • scheduling priorities - prioritizing LB resources
    • lease requested (balanced) vs. most requested (packed)
@Huang-Wei Huang-Wei added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant