You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have data from a group specifically interested in looking at cells up to 72h ischemia. Converted to seconds this is 259200 seconds, which doesn't validate against the current maximum level set for the ischemic_time field (100000 seconds).
"ischemic_time": {
"minimum": 0,
"type": "integer",
"description": "Duration of time, in seconds, that the body part had insufficient blood supply.",
"maximum": 100000
},
What was the motivation behind choosing this maximum value? I suggest increasing to accommodate this use case.
I'm happy to make the change, which will then necessitate a minor release v4.3.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have data from a group specifically interested in looking at cells up to 72h ischemia. Converted to seconds this is 259200 seconds, which doesn't validate against the current maximum level set for the ischemic_time field (100000 seconds).
What was the motivation behind choosing this maximum value? I suggest increasing to accommodate this use case.
I'm happy to make the change, which will then necessitate a minor release v4.3.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: