Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce VariableRepresentation class #80

Closed
lanthaler opened this issue Jan 4, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Introduce VariableRepresentation class #80

lanthaler opened this issue Jan 4, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@lanthaler
Copy link
Member

In #30 we introduced hydra:BasicRepresentation and hydra:ExplicitRepresentation but didn't describe them any further for machines. For certain use cases (mostly searching available representation formats) it would be beneficial to have a class such as hydra:VariableRepresentation.

RubenVerborgh added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 5, 2015
Implements the proposed resolution for #80.
@lanthaler
Copy link
Member Author

Generally, we try to avoid having a property and a class which differ only in their capitalization. Should we follow Schema.org's convention and name this hydra:VariableRepresentationType instead of just hydra:VariableRepresentation?

@lanthaler
Copy link
Member Author

@lanthaler
Copy link
Member Author

RESOLVED: Add the class VariableRepresentation. The only two instances at the moment are hydra:BasicRepresentation and hydra:ExplicitRepresentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant